Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Revolutionary Context

Early 20th century was a period of many revolutions on all social fronts. Naturally, artistic expression was used as a medium of announcing the new, recalling the past, projecting into the future and protesting the undesirable ways of the world. The Mulatto was painted in 1913, in the fast-changing and cacophonous pre-World War 1 social environment.

The culture of Berlin in 1910s and 20s was very fertile and gave birth to sophisticated and innovative artistic styles in different art forms: Bauhaus (1919-33) in architecture and design; German modernism in literature (Döblin, Berlin Alexanderplatz, 1929); German expressionistic cinema (Lang, Dietrich); music (Weill and Brecht); New Objectivity (Grosz) and German expressionism in painting (Nolde); German idealism and aesthetic theory in criticism (Benjamin); and analytical psychology and philosophy (Jung). (Laqueur) This cultural fertility extended onwards until Adolf Hitler took power in 1933 and stamped out this culture that he considered decadent.

The most important artistic revolution that pertains to the work in focus is German Expressionism. As discussed in one of the earlier posts, Expressionism was a movement that emerged simultaneously in various cities across Germany as a response to a widespread anxiety about humanity’s increasingly discordant relationship with the world and left an important directional and stylistic mark on many different artistic disciplines. Some characteristics of German Expressionism in painting were bright colors, thick obvious brushstrokes, and bold forms. (MOMA)

On the political front, it is possible to relate this work to the series of national revolutions that happened in different corners of the world, as colonized countries demanded their independence from empires. Empires played the most important role in the racial mixing that defined the 18th and 19th centuries. When countries gained their national character, questions of racial diversity became more prominent and gave rise to artistic trends like primitivism and political extremities like Nazism.

A discussion of this work would not be complete without a reference to a destructive anti-revolution that directly affected it two decades after its completion.
After his ascent to power, Hitler rejected all forms of modernism as “degenerate art,” and Nolde’s work was officially condemned by the Nazi regime. Although he was initially sympathetic to National Socialism, Nazis nevertheless confiscated 1,052 works, more than from any other artist. He was prohibited by Nazis from painting in 1941, but continued secretly in watercolor until bombs destroyed his studio in Berlin and the archive of his prints in 1944. This painting is particularly important since it can be read as the epitome of all that the Nazis despised: she demonstrates what mixing races will produce and supplies pictorial evidence for the Nazis' point of view claiming the necessity of keeping German blood pure. (Bradley, Chapter 5)

Sources:

Bradley, William S. Emil Nolde and German Expressionism: A Prophet in His Own Land. Vol. no. 52. Ann Arbor, Mich.: UMI Research Press, 1986.

Laqueur, Walter Weimar: A cultural history, 1918-1933, Putnam, 1974

Moma: German Expressionism - 

No comments:

Post a Comment